The warehouse and distribution center is under increasing pressure to reduce cost and increase margins, according to recent research from Intermec Inc. The workflow performance company—which designs data capture and information management solutions at the interface between mobile workers, assets and customers—released research which shows that in the last six months alone, nearly eight out of 10 (79 percent) warehouse managers have been tasked with finding an average 19 percent cost saving from existing operations. Despite this mounting pressure to cut costs and the need to find efficiency gains in every process, managers admit to losing time and money through known inefficient workflows.
The report, which surveyed 250 supply chain, warehouse and distribution managers, stated that over an eight hour shift, each worker loses an average of 15 minutes of productivity in an inefficient process. For a small-to medium-sized warehouse with 50 workers, this quickly adds up to nearly 3,000 hours a year and could be a significantly higher number in larger organizations.
Although most managers have been tasked with finding cost savings, close to one in three (30 percent) have not conducted a review of workflow processes in their distribution center within the past year. This is the first step in identifying areas for improvement.
The majority of managers who participated in the survey believe the most inefficient workflow in an eight-hour shift to be packing and loading (20 percent), closely followed by picking and inventory control (both 18 percent).
This comes from the data produced by companies that have recently conducted a workflow process review, who confirm that inventory control (53 percent) and picking (47 percent) are the two areas where cost savings could most easily be achieved.
Strong resistance to change
In addition, the research shows that in companies that are yet to take action to improve workflow productivity, there are high levels of resistance to the idea of carrying out a full review.
Managers who have not held a review in the past year, say that only compliance (28 percent) or poor performance (27 percent) would prompt them to do so today. The latter point is in stark contrast to those companies that have recently conducted a review and implemented process improvements as a result, who say that they are mostly motivated by compliance issues (26 percent) or continuous improvement programs (22 percent) and rate poor performance as a very low (nine percent) driver for their action.
In addition, nearly one in five companies (16 percent) say they will not review their workflow processes until after a customer complaint has been received.
Meeting cost targets
Whether they are prepared to conduct a review or not, the survey carried out by research firm Vanson Bourne identifies the very clear pressures that warehouse and distribution center managers are under.
Nearly all respondents appear to agree on the key to achieving this goal. When asked how to improve performance across the warehouse and distribution center, the overwhelming majority of managers (89 percent) said they believed investment in new technology would enable them to scale back their lost time and ensure greater worker productivity.
There is also increased awareness of the value that shaving just seconds off workflow processes can bring. Nearly two thirds (60 percent) agree that large time and cost savings opportunities can be found in gaining back mere seconds in operations workflows. Examples of how to achieve this include having workers take fewer steps; investing in faster label printing and quicker barcode label scanning; and eliminating battery changes mid-shift.
“Warehouse managers are faced with significant cost saving challenges, which means they can’t afford to let such levels of time wastage continue,” said Bruce Stubbs, Industry Marketing Director for Distribution Center Operations, Intermec. “Businesses should be looking at every workflow in detail on a regular basis to claim back the minutes and seconds they need to achieve these savings. As this research shows, reviewing their technology infrastructure may be the perfect place to start.”